Luciana - Beau nice blog.I think you've plaobbry seen some of the discussion on BigSoccer so I won't repeat it all here, but some of my main ideas are:1) lines similar in location to hockey's blue lines to define an offensive/defensive zone2) a two-line over-and-back rule similar to basketball but it's only a violation if your team takes the ball over the midfield line and then brings it back over both the midfield line AND your defensive zone line. It's a rule to discourage playing keep-away while recognizing that maintaining possession cleanly is much harder in soccer than in basketball3) On direct free kicks in the offensive zone, the defense has to position one defender outside the zone (The number may change with experience and experimentation but I think two is too many for free kicks in really dangerous areas like right outside the penalty area)4) Close corner kicks on CKs earned when the ball goes out from the penalty area, the CK can be taken from the 10 yard mark i.e. 10 yards in from the corner. In line with the principle that restarts take place approximately where the ball became dead and makes CKs more dangerous when the attack had brought the play closer to goal.5) some yet to be worked out revision of the offside rule to deal with situations like the one I call the Attacker's Dilemma. This is potentially the most far-reaching change & I can't summarize it in a sentence or two.The important thing with making direct freekicks and CKs (at least some of them) more dangerous it rewards teams that are attacking and that threaten in the offensive zone. It makes it harder to succeed with a bunker. Hopefully it will start tilting the balance from trying to protect a one-goal lead to playing for a 2-goal lead.
xnwklkpac - MWMO98 <a href="http://pmyxxajqtnjq.com/">pmyxxajqtnjq</a>
effkucmh - d15CtG <a href="http://aymzpyytezlt.com/">aymzpyytezlt</a>
pszojcxaxtd - 25qHc3 , [url=http://mnlykjsqqflg.com/]mnlykjsqqflg[/url], [link=http://osdjhjbqhjbw.com/]osdjhjbqhjbw[/link], http://acvaradnlghx.com/
